Showing posts with label Residential Buildings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Residential Buildings. Show all posts

Friday, July 19, 2013

Prefabricating Buildings Offsite, Then Installing Them In Location: Is There A Real Renaissance?


Modular Residential Building

In New York’s Inwood neighborhood, workers are busy stacking together weighty prebuilt modules made in Pennsylvania, as they piece together one of the city’s latest and more notable residential complexes built almost entirely offsite.

Prefabricated construction, as it's technically known, is constructing a building away from its ultimate location. Developers and architects increasingly look to the technique as a way to save time and money, even as they try to shake off the technique’s negative associations.
In the case of Inwood, project principals at the 28-apartment complex dubbed "The Stack" point out that construction should take only 10 months from start to finish, down from the 16 months they would project for traditional construction.
Developer Jeffrey Brown and architect Peter Gluck told International Business Times that the prefab option in this case is cheaper and faster and doesn’t drag down the quality of the finished work.
“There are savings in time, savings in money,” said Brown, who noted that The Stack is his first wholly prefabricated project. “There are advantages by just condensing the entire construction process.” 
At the site, workers deploy a crane to lift a sizeable wrapped box, or module, onto the top of the stack. Fifty-six such modules were built for this project by hand in a Pennsylvania factory over three months, and installation onsite is scheduled to take only a month.
Gluck, who has worked with prefabricated projects since the 1970s, also acknowledged obstacles specific to prefab building. Overseeing the manufacturing required close supervision, he said.
The technique is not new, said Gluck, citing a failed 1970s push to develop prefabricated homes in American suburbs. But both Gluck and Brown believe there’s a budding renaissance in offsite construction. That comes despite a widespread perception that prefab buildings lack design cachet and are used mostly for cheap and poor-quality mobile homes.
“I think there is a renaissance,” said Brown in an onsite interview, during the initial installations in July. “It’s starting with an awareness that this type of construction can be done with an imagination, and it can be done with a thoughtful design, and it can produce a really cool product.”
modular building in nyc
A May 2011 McGraw-Hill Construction report found that prefab building is emerging once again as a U.S. trend, tied partly to the popularity of "green" buildings and digital modeling.
After surveying hundreds of industry professionals, researchers found that the real estate industry is increasingly moving toward prefab to boost productivity and cut waste.
Michele Russo, who worked on that report, told IBTimes: “There have been some really huge transformational trends taking place in construction over the past three to four years, which have also created this push for prefab.”
modular construction new york
Digital modeling allows you to see how prefab pieces fit together, allowing better advance planning, while reduced waste and better safety for workers are also factors, she said.
“All of these things combined with an economy that put pressure on the industry means that they’ve looked for efficiencies,” she said. “Prefab has been around forever, but the next evolution of prefab has been in the last three or four years.”
Cheaper labor in a controlled factory environment, where there’s less safety risk, is part of the appeal, added McGraw-Hill Construction researcher Harvey Bernstein.
modular buildings in new york
Although interest in prefab technique ebbs and flows, the renewed interest this time could be permanent, he said.
“When you start to look at some of the real benefits, in terms of shorter schedules, lower costs and less waste, all of sizeable percentages, it just makes good bottom-line business sense,” he said.
“I think you’re going to see more and more predominance” of prefab, he said, even if only for specific small components, like plumbing or electrical systems.
The McGraw-Hill survey found that 98 percent of engineers, architects and contractors expected to be doing some prefab work by the end of 2013, up from 85 percent currently. While only a third of the industry now uses prefab construction heavily, that’s expected to grow to about 45 percent by the end of 2013.
Hospital, hotel and educational construction are the most promising fields for expansion into prefab construction, said the report.
Global interest in offsite construction is also rising. In one well-known example, the world’s tallest building, in China’s Changsha, will be prebuilt in four months. It just broke ground in June, reports Treehugger.
prefab construction in new york
Broad Sustainable Building, the Chinese firm building Changsha’s "Sky City," also built a 30-story building in Hunan last year in 15 days from prefab materials. Other notable recent examples include Seoul’s residential skyscraper Velo Towers and the Kilk building system, by Australian companies Elenberg Fraser and Unitised Building.
Gluck, too, said Japan has hosted several notable prefab projects, adding that Europeans seem to welcome the concept more than Americans. Bernstein said he had no data on global prefab trends but that anecdotally there is apparent heightened interest.
A September 2012 report on global prefab trends by industry researcher Timetric valued the global prefab market at $65 billion in 2011, with the European market representing about half of that, making it the largest single market. Asia is the second-largest market, where prefab is still rapidly becoming more popular.  
Nonetheless, prefab construction still has its critics. Some point out that budget savings for developers don’t always translate to cheaper homes for tenants, at least for single-family homes – individual prefabricated homes are often customized expensive trophies for wealthy clients. (Gluck wouldn’t disclose how much it cost per square foot to build The Stack, nor how much they’d rent their apartments for, but he said rents would be competitive.)
Other critics say that developers can’t turn profits by making prefabricated residential development their chief business because the market is still very underdeveloped. Bernstein noted, though, that Maine firm Cianbro is prefabricating power plants and refineries and shipping them out to Texas by sea, part of a rising trend of prefabrication in industrial development.  
On a related front, some argue that outsourcing construction to offsite factory workers lowers labor and building-quality standards.  
In New York, plumbers and mechanics sued the New York City buildings department earlier this week, alleging that safety standards were violated when developer Forest City Ratner used factory workers to build a planned 32-story complex offsite. The project is destined for Brooklyn’s Atlantic Yards.
In an email to IBTimes, Stewart O’Brien, a former commissioner at the city’s building department, said that workers doing prefab construction offsite must have the same credentials as those doing construction work onsite.
O’Brien is a party to the suit, for the plaintiffs, and now leads the New York Plumbing Foundation. A ruling by the city’s building department that normal plumbing and fire safety rules don’t apply to buildings made offsite is plainly wrong, said court papers.
“Modern day, more and more modular construction has moved toward high-density projects,” wrote O’Brien. “Should tenants or occupants of modular buildings be afforded any less safety protections?”
But back in Inwood, these sorts of concerns about prefab are far from people’s minds.
Marc Gee, another principal from the GLUCK+ architects behind the project, is more focused on prospective tenants. 
“We’ve had so many calls that I don’t think it’s going to be an issue,” he said of filling The Stack’s 28 rental flats. “There’s a lot of need for this kind of housing… This is really modern.” 
Written By: Nat Rudarakanchana

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

PREFAB FOR HUMANITY


In inner-city Baltimore, Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake paves a path to affordable prefab.
MODULAR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR

Architect Edward Paul Haladay is one of those people who retires and immediately starts looking for work. Soon after closing the door on a practice heavy on Caribbean resorts, the Baltimore, Maryland, resident walked into Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake’s office in 2008 to start volunteering. The local affiliate had just bought a vacant lot in McElderry Park, where nearly 40 percent of families live below the poverty line.

Haladay had recently seen the New York Museum of Modern Art’s prefab exhibit, Home Delivery, and was disappointed by its Tinkertoy mentality. “The best homes were all made like jewelry, with special joints and fittings,” he says. “There was not one thing the 99 percent could buy.” Doing research for Habitat, he discovered most modular homes cost $200 to $300 per square foot, plus the cost of land. He knew modular was a good solution for Habitat, but he had to do it for less money.

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS

The architect’s row home design for Fayette Street takes into account the everyday lives of the Habitat families—mostly single moms with two or three kids. The homes are “not esoteric,” says Haladay. “We used durable but simple materials, and we put them together prosaically.” Still, there are plenty of practical and thoughtful touches: A two-by-six-foot skylight brightens the central stairwell and beams light into the bathroom and living room via wall perforations. Haladay also insisted on a full basement, generous closet space, and articulated facades to encourage customization—all for less than $100 per square foot.

Despite rain, the installation of nine homes over two nights drew a large crowd. They cheered every time a crane lifted and lowered a module into place. Says Haladay, who still hasn’t retired, “The spectacle was already bringing the community together.”

FAYETTE STREET BY THE NUMBERS


Row house dimensions:
12 by 55 feet

Distance from factory to destination:
Roughly 130 miles

Module cost:
$43.75 per square foot

Completed home cost:
$96.25 per square foot,
or $154,000 each (excluding land)

Construction time:
10 working days in factory

Installation time:
2 nights (plus 1 month
to build foundations)

Time to install a typical gut-renovated or stick-built Habitat house:
6 months


Written By: Caroline Tiger
Source: http://www.dwell.com/great-idea/article/prefab-humanity

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Modular Buildings for Oil Extraction



The oil business is booming and workers are flooding to high-paying jobs in states like North Dakota. However, many of these areas are so remote that there are no viable housing options for those workers. Modular construction is an efficient solution in areas with elevated growth and where oil drilling has expanded the workforce beyond capacity.

Modular homes can be constructed much faster because site work and factory construction are completed simultaneously. Unlike traditional construction, modular homes are not greatly impacted by weather. Because they're constructed off-site, they can be built at any time of year, even during North Dakota's harsh winter season.

Modular structures can be customized to meet the exact size and layout of each client. Additionally, homes can come in a variety of colors and designs, ensuring clients have a comfortable and welcoming place to call home.

Modular construction is a fast solution for commercial and residential projects. A modular building can take the stress away from lengthy construction timelines and allows buildings to be completed up to 40% faster. Modular construction meets the housing demands of growing areas.

In addition to modular homes, commercial structures can be constructed much more efficiently with modular construction, helping to build the infrastructure and support the rapid growth of areas.